588: Tariffs, Trade Wars, and Billion-Dollar Consequences

Podcast: Download (Duration: 39:31 — 45.3MB)

The 2025 China tariff shock (rates that spiked as high as 125-145%) has upended sourcing math for every ecommerce brand that touches Chinese manufacturing. Toni Herrbach and I recorded this episode in the middle of that chaos to walk through what is actually happening on the ground: how the tariffs apply to containers already on the water, how sellers are pricing without spooking customers, why Chinese factories are leaking desperate TikToks, and why the smallest sellers may actually be the most agile through this.

The short answer: sellers with high margins and existing customer bases have a runway, sellers already at 50-60% margins are getting crushed by the doubling of landed cost, and new sellers starting from zero right now paradoxically have the most flexibility because they can pick a country of origin without any legacy tooling or supplier relationships to unwind.

Below is the full playbook we covered: container-in-transit rules, how we are quietly raising prices at Bumblebee Linens, what the Chinese-factory TikTok flood actually signals, and why Steve believes every listener needs a side income right now regardless of tariffs.

Get My Free Mini Course On How To Start A Successful Ecommerce Store

If you are interested in starting an ecommerce business, I put together a comprehensive package of resources that will help you launch your own online store from complete scratch. Be sure to grab it before you leave!

Click Here To Download

Key takeaways on the 2025 China tariffs

• Original reciprocal-tariff order had a “goods on the water” exemption; the later 125% and 145% rates did not have publicly documented equivalent exemptions at the time of recording, so containers in transit are the immediate margin risk.
• A 50% margin business becomes a 0% margin business when landed cost doubles, which is why sellers with thin margins are refusing shipments or delaying orders.
• Sellers with 600+ SKUs (like Bumblebee Linens) can raise prices slowly across categories without customer backlash; single-SKU brands have to rip the bandaid off.
• Chinese textile factories are hurting: down-jacket containers cancelled mid-production, vendors sending unusually urgent “place your order now” messages.
• Reshoring to the US is not a 30-day fix: even a Tesla-scale factory takes 3 years to stand up, and most Americans do not want to live next to the manufacturing plants that would result.
• India is currently positioned as the next-China because they signaled willingness to negotiate rather than retaliate, but no country is a safe multi-year bet without a tariff roadmap.
• Chinese factories are flooding TikTok with “luxury dupe” content aimed at Hermes, Gucci, and Ferragamo, which is chaotic short-term marketing but a long-term IP-trust catastrophe for Chinese manufacturing.
• New ecommerce sellers actually have more flexibility right now than entrenched ones, because they can source from India, the US, or Europe from day one.

Do tariffs apply to containers already on the water?

The original round of reciprocal tariffs included an “on the water” exemption: if your container shipped before the tariff took effect, the old rate applied. That clause was documented for the first round.

The later escalations (the 125% and 145% headline rates) did not have publicly documented equivalent exemptions at the time of this recording, so if you have a container that shipped after those went live, you should assume the new rate applies until your customs broker tells you otherwise. Do not guess; ask your broker in writing.

How the tariffs are hitting real ecommerce sellers right now

Sellers with margins in the 50-60% range are getting crushed because doubling the landed cost of goods erases the margin entirely. A mutual friend, Brandon, has a container of shoes on the water with roughly 50% margins; at a 125% tariff his options are take the shipment and lose money, break even at best, or refuse the shipment and eat the deposit.

Sellers with fatter margins (Bumblebee Linens is in this bucket) can absorb the hit and make less money for a while without going upside down. Sellers who already diversified sourcing after the first Trump tariff cycle (we moved production to India, the US, and parts of Europe) are the least exposed today.

The pattern in our community: sellers are delaying orders, putting down deposits and pausing production, or actively refusing shipments where the math no longer works.

What Chinese factories are doing (and what the TikTok leaks mean)

Chinese factories are visibly hurting: leaked TikToks show empty production floors, cancelled orders, and workers sitting idle. There is a factory full of finished down jackets that the buyer walked away from mid-production, which is the kind of loss that a factory cannot absorb without cutting workers.

Vendor messages to sellers have shifted noticeably. The tone is more urgent, more “place your order now,” which is the opposite of the usual “we can slot you in next quarter.”

The macro pressure matters. The US consumes roughly a third of global goods; if that demand drops sharply and quickly, the factories that invested heavily in machinery still have to service the debt on that machinery whether the lines run or not.

The luxury-dupe TikTok flood

The most visible Chinese response has been a wave of TikToks from purported factory owners claiming they manufacture bags for Hermes, Gucci, Ferragamo, and other luxury brands, then linking to direct-purchase versions at ~10% of the retail price. Some links go through TikTok Shop directly; more go through QR codes or bio links that route off-platform.

Short term this feels like a clever counter-punch. Long term it may be the single dumbest move Chinese manufacturing has made, because every brand watching this unfold is now permanently deciding never to give their IP to a Chinese factory again.

The buyer analysis matters too. People carrying a real $35,000 Birkin do it for status; they will not carry a knockoff. The people buying the dupes were never going to buy the real bag, so the direct revenue hit to Hermes is minor.

The reputational hit to Chinese manufacturing broadly is what matters. Even if past IP violations happened quietly on Amazon, this round is loud and public, and it accelerates the diversification decisions large brands were already contemplating.

How to raise prices without spooking your ecommerce customers

The two schools of thought on raising prices in a tariff shock are the slow-roll and the bandaid-rip. Neither is wrong; it depends on your SKU count and customer base.

At Bumblebee Linens we have roughly 600 SKUs, so we are raising prices gradually across different categories week by week. It is the “restaurant portion sizes shrink and the plate gets bigger” method, and most customers will not notice individual increases when they are staggered.

If you have 10-20 SKUs, the slow-roll does not have enough cover to hide behind and you should rip the bandaid. Send the “prices going up on X date, this is your last chance to buy at current pricing” email that a lot of stores are already sending, then raise prices cleanly.

What car manufacturers are doing (and the lesson for ecommerce)

Ford and Hyundai are running “employee pricing” campaigns during the tariff shock, which drops sticker prices even as tariffs push wholesale costs up. The move is a headline win.

The pricing giveaway is being paid for on the back end. Ford dropped its 2% financing and raised the interest rate; Hyundai bundled free EV charger installation while adjusting other terms.

Toyota’s dealers, meanwhile, are holding MSRP steady while adding roughly $6,000 in “market adjustment” fees at the actual sale, which is a stealth tariff pass-through. The lesson for ecommerce: choose your visible price lever carefully, because customers price-anchor on what they see (sticker/MSRP) and are less sensitive to what is bundled around it (financing, shipping, fees).

Reshoring is not a 30-day fix

Standing up domestic manufacturing to replace Chinese production takes 1-3 years minimum, so “just make it in America” is not a tariff mitigation strategy for existing sellers. The Tesla Austin gigafactory took roughly 3 years from ground-break to production; that is what “fast” looks like for a well-funded operator.

Small ecommerce brands cannot throw up a factory in Wyoming to backfill a China supplier. Even if capital were unlimited, you still need permits, staffed labor pools, and neighbors willing to live next to a paper plant or textile mill (I live near a paper plant; it smells like a chemistry accident 24/7).

The realistic pivot for existing sellers is a country substitution: India is the current favorite because they signaled willingness to negotiate rather than retaliate. Vietnam is a mixed bet because Chinese factories poured huge investment into Vietnamese production and any Vietnam-specific tariff (the tabled rate was ~46%) instantly wipes those investments.

Why new ecommerce sellers may actually be more agile in a tariff shock

New ecommerce sellers can source from any country from day one, which is a structural advantage over sellers with 5-year vendor relationships and molds locked into a single Chinese factory. Toni’s workshop this month compared identical products sourced from China, the US, and India, and the numbers on a fresh product decision look very different than they do on a mid-life SKU with existing tooling.

Existing sellers pay switching costs. They have molds owned by the Chinese factory, product designs iterated over years, quality standards their current supplier hits reliably, and container schedules that are already booked. New sellers pay none of that.

Even with tariffs, China is still often cheaper than the US by roughly 2x on comparable products (Toni ran the numbers in the workshop). India lands close to China’s tariffed price on many categories, though direct comparisons are hard because the exact same product often does not exist in the Indian supplier base.

Should ecommerce sellers just lay low and wait?

Laying low is not really an option when tariffs are the sudden shock and there is no roadmap on how long they will last. Without visibility on future rates, planning is essentially guessing.

If you shift production to India today and India tariffs spike in 90 days, you have wasted the pivot. If you sit on your hands and China rates fall in 90 days, you have wasted the runway.

The move I would make: keep your existing supplier warm, put a small parallel order into a second country to establish the relationship and quality benchmark, and hold cash. Do not commit to a full production shift until Washington publishes a durable rate schedule that lasts more than a quarter.

The bigger picture: AI is a bigger threat to your income than tariffs

Every listener should have a side income right now regardless of the tariff story, because AI is quietly displacing more jobs than trade policy is. Silicon Valley engineers report their companies have effectively stopped hiring new engineers; H&M is already using AI-generated models for clothing; Canva is releasing production tools next month that will hollow out large parts of graphic-design roles.

The gig economy is next. Waymo is now live in multiple US cities and expanding to Japan, which is a slow-moving replacement of Uber, Lyft, Uber Eats, and eventually DoorDash drivers.

You do not need ecommerce specifically. You need something on the side that you own, so that when your primary income source is disrupted (by trade policy, by AI, or by a company decision you do not control), you have optionality.

Frequently asked questions

Do the 2025 China tariffs apply to my container already on the water?

The first round of reciprocal tariffs had a documented “on the water” exemption, but the later 125% and 145% escalations did not have publicly documented equivalent exemptions at the time of this episode. Ask your customs broker in writing before assuming which rate applies, because the situation has been changing weekly.

How are ecommerce sellers pricing through the tariff shock?

Sellers with hundreds of SKUs are staggering price increases across categories over weeks or months (the “boil the frog” method) so no single change spooks customers. Sellers with fewer SKUs are ripping the bandaid off with a “prices going up on X date” email and raising all prices at once.

Is it a good time to start an ecommerce business with tariffs this high?

Starting an ecommerce business during a tariff shock is easier in one way (you can source from India, the US, or Europe from day one with no legacy supplier relationships) and harder in another (macro uncertainty makes any long-term commitment risky). Existing sellers with locked-in China production and thin margins are worse off than a new seller with sourcing flexibility and no sunk costs.

Where should I source instead of China right now?

India is currently the strongest alternative because they signaled willingness to negotiate rather than retaliate, and their manufacturing base can cover a lot of ecommerce categories. Vietnam is a viable but riskier option because Chinese factories invested heavily in Vietnamese production and any Vietnam-specific tariff can wipe those investments overnight.

Why are Chinese factories flooding TikTok with luxury-brand dupes?

Chinese factories are using TikTok content that claims to expose luxury manufacturing origins and links to direct-purchase dupes at roughly 10% of the retail price. Short term it drives sales and puts pressure on Western luxury brands; long term it is arguably self-destructive for Chinese manufacturing because it signals to every brand still sourcing from China that IP is not respected, accelerating diversification.

Should small ecommerce brands try to move production to the US?

Small brands generally cannot move production to the US quickly, because reshoring a real manufacturing line takes 1-3 years even for well-funded operators (Tesla’s Austin gigafactory took roughly 3 years). A country substitution to India, Vietnam, or Mexico is a faster pivot than trying to stand up domestic manufacturing.

Are US ecommerce sellers in a better position than Chinese factories through this?

US ecommerce sellers are in a better structural position because we have multiple sourcing countries to choose from, while Chinese factories dependent on US demand cannot easily redirect production to other buyers. The US buys roughly a third of the world’s goods, and no other market will absorb a factory’s capacity of, say, 100,000 lightsabers if the US stops.

Ready To Get Serious About Starting An Online Business?

If you are really considering starting your own online business, then you have to check out my free mini course on How To Create A Niche Online Store In 5 Easy Steps.

In this 6 day mini course, I reveal the steps that my wife and I took to earn 100 thousand dollars in the span of just a year. Best of all, it's absolutely free!